TEMPLATE INCLUDED AND LINK FOR ASSIGNMENT I WANT DONE
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=953fa368-d5c4-4d23-a130-c3b00e8249db%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=12342695&db=a9h
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=953fa368-d5c4-4d23-a130-c3b00e8249db%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=12342695&db=a9hhttp://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=953fa368-d5c4-4d23-a130-c3b00e8249db%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=12342695&db=a9hhttp://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=953fa368-d5c4-4d23-a130-c3b00e8249db%40sessionmgr103&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=12342695&db=a9h
Journal Article Reviews Instructions
You will write 2 Journal Article Reviews (Modules/Weeks 1 and 5), which will be based upon your choice of articles from the professional, peer-reviewed journal articles provided in Blackboard.No outside articles will be accepted. Each Journal Article Summary must be 3–5 double-spaced pages (not including the title and reference pages) and created in a Microsoft Word document.Use the following guidelines to create your paper:
Start your paper with a title page, correctly formatted per current APA. Use the provided template and the basic current APA components will be in place. Divide your paper into sections with the following Level One headings: Summary, Reflection, and Application as described on the template.
Develop a summary(35 points) of the main concepts from the article. Do not duplicate the article’s abstract. If the article describes a research study, include brief statements about the hypotheses, methods, results, discussion, and implications. If any test measures or statistical methods used are given in the article, do not provide detailed descriptions of these. Short direct quotations from the article are acceptable, but avoid long quotes in a paper this size. This section is the foundation of your Journal Article Review (at least a third of your paper). Make sure you include the core points from the article, even if it means a longer section. Do not reference any additional articles in your summary.
In approximately 1 page, reflect(10 points) on the article using your own words. Appropriate comments for this part of the paper could include, but are not limited to, your initial response to the article, comments regarding the study’s design or methodology (if any), insights you gained from reading the article, your reasons for being interested in this particular article, any other readings that you may plan to do based upon having read the article, and other thoughts you have that might further enhance the discussion of your article. Your subjective comments in this section must be clearly tied to main points from the article, not peripheral ideas. Again, do not reference any other article.
In your final section, in approximately 1 page, write how you would apply(25 points) the information you have learned from this article to a particular counseling setting. Make this setting one that would typically be seen in human services counseling—community services agencies, adoption agencies, volunteer counseling settings such as in churches, etc. Develop this section as if you are a pastor or clinician and your parishioner or client has come to you with a problem—grief, depression, substance abuse, relationships problems, etc.— needing your help. Adequately describe the counseling scenario including the presenting problem. Draw out concepts from the article and apply them to the scenario as if you were guided only by the content of the article. Show the reader how you expressly drew from the journal article in this application section and cite correctly, per APA.
Use the provided current APA template and personalize the template for your particular article.
Point values for each section as well as for writing can be found on the grading rubric. Remember that all papers in the program must be written to professional (graduate level) standards and writing/APAcan contribute 30 points to your score.
Running head: ABBREVIATED VERSION OF YOUR TITLE
Journal Article Review
Student Name
School Affiliation
1
ABBREVIATED VERSION OF YOUR TITLE
2
Title of Paper
Summary
APA Headings
Level
Format
1
Centered, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Headings
2
Left-aligned, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading
3
Indented, boldface, lowercase heading with a period. Begin body text after the
period.
4
Indented, boldface, italicized, lowercase heading with a period. Begin body text after
the period.
5
Indented, italicized, lowercase heading with a period. Begin body text after the period.
Reflection
Application
(Reed & Enright, 2006)
ABBREVIATED VERSION OF YOUR TITLE
3
Reference
Reed, G. L., & Enright, R. D. (2006). The effects of forgiveness therapy on depression, anxiety,
and posttraumatic stress for women after spousal emotional abuse. Journal of Consulting
& Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 920-929. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.5920
HSCO 506
JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEWS GRADING RUBRIC
100 POINTS
Criteria
Criteria
Content
70%: 70
Points
Content—
Summary:
35 points
Levels of Achievement
Advanced 92-100 (A- Proficient 84-91 (B- to
to A):
B+) :
Satisfies criteria w/
Satisfies criteria at the
excellence
graduate level
65-70 Points
59-64 Points
33-35 points
Student meets the
requirements as
listed in the
“Proficient”
column but
provides more
extensive
explanation
(concisely written
and without
wordiness)
In addition, student
demonstrates full
understanding of
key ideas
supporting the
main points,
explains some of
30-32 points
Student provides
summary of
salient/main points
that is concisely
worded but of
sufficient length to
adequately provide
a reasonably
complete review of
the article
Summary includes
all major topics of
the article (if the
article is a research
study, briefly
describes
hypotheses,
methods, results,
discussion, and
Developing 76-83 (Cto C+):
Satisfies most criteria
53-58 Points
27-29 points
Student includes
some of the
requirements in the
“Proficient” column
Student may not
clearly distinguish
main points from
peripheral or
supporting ideas
Below Expectations
1-75 (F to D+):
Does not satisfy
criteria
0-52 Points
Not
Present
1-26 points
0 points
Points
Earned
Student clearly
deviates from
the requirements
in the
“Proficient”
column
Student may
omit many key
ideas from the
summary
Student may
incorrectly
review key
research
elements in an
Page 1 of 5
HSCO 506
the supporting
information,
clearly separates
the core ideas from
peripheral ideas,
recognizes
underlying
presuppositions of
main points and
implications for
human services
counseling
ContentReflection:
10 points
10 points
Student includes
requirements from
the “Proficient”
column but also
demonstrates
exceptional insight
and understanding,
identifies
weaknesses and
strengths in the
article, and offers
unique
implications for
human services
counseling
implications).
empirical article
Summary
adequately provides
the foundation for
the subsequent 2
sections of paper.
Article is chosen
from list provided.
9 points
Reflection is
approximately 1
page of text and
includes:
initial response,
comments about
design/methodology
(if appropriate),
insights gained,
reasons for your
interest in topic, and
future research
interest based on
topic.
8 points
Student includes
some of the
elements mentioned
in the “Proficient”
column and may
demonstrate only a
perfunctory
understanding of
the article
1-7 points
0 points
Student clearly
deviates from
the requirements
mentioned in the
“Proficient”
column
Page 2 of 5
HSCO 506
ContentApplication
: 25 points
23-25 points
Student meets the
requirements listed
in the “Proficient”
column but in
addition,
demonstrates
superb
understanding of
the appropriate
concepts for
application as
applied to the
proposed
counseling
scenario. Student
draws concepts
broadly from the
article and
explains the
applications with
excellence,
explaining reasons
why the concepts
would best fit this
scenario.
21-22 points
Application is at
least one page of
text and includes
description of a
human services
counseling
situation along with
the presenting
problems which
would be
appropriate for
application of
concepts from this
article.
19-20 points
Student meets some
of the requirements
listed in the
“Proficient” column
1-18 points
0 points
Student fails to
meet many of
the requirements
listed in the
“Proficient”
column
Student clearly
applies specific
concepts from the
article (correctly
cited) to the
counseling scenario
with adequate
justification for the
application
Page 3 of 5
HSCO 506
Structure
30%: 30
points
Writing
Organizati
on and
Clarity: 20
points
Writing
Mechanics
and
Formattin
g: 10
points
28-30 Points
19-20 points
Student
demonstrates
“professional
writing” as
mentioned under
the “Proficient”
column and
described by
DCCC. Beyond
that, writing is
superb with
excellent flow of
ideas and is totally
free of errors.
10 points
Paper is totally
free of mechanical
errors and follows
APA fully.
26-27 Points
17-18 points
Student
demonstrates
“professional
writing” as defined
by DCCC. This
would include
proper sentence
construction,
paragraph
organization,
transitions, and
logical flow of
ideas.
23-25 Points
16
Paper exhibits some
writing that would
not be considered
“professional” and
has some basic
writing errors.
9 points
8 points
Student largely
follows APA for
formatting,
citations, use of
quotes, etc.
Paper exhibits a
number of
mechanical and
APA errors
1-22 Points
1-15 points
0 points
Paper
significantly
deviates from
the requirements
mentioned in the
“Proficient”
column.
1-7 points
0 points
Paper exhibits
numerous
deviations from
the elements
mentioned in the
Proficient
Page 4 of 5
HSCO 506
Paper is largely free
of mechanical
errors.
column
Total
Page 5 of 5