Overview
It is essential that the hypotheses and design of epidemiological research studies use the best methods and knowledge to further understand issues of concern and exposure in the community. It is expected that all research has scientific merit, has a hypothesis that warrants study, is competently conducted, and produces findings that are the result of good scientific effort.
Instructions
Propose an intervention to address an identified public health issue in your community of interest. Review a minimum of five previous intervention studies, and propose one intervention study that would be the best solution to address the problem and how you will manage implementation of the intervention.
Your proposed intervention should include the following information:
- Background Information.What is the intervention?Why is this evidence translatable?Who is the target population?What is the rationale this intervention would be the solution to the problem?
- Methodology.Identify the study design.Discuss the theoretical framework for the study.Explain the implementation strategy.Explain how collaboration will play a role in the implementation of this study.Explain what data will be collected.Explain how the data will be analyzed.Discuss the potential ethical issues that may impact the intervention.Discuss the IRB process for the study.Include the proposed time to see the results of the intervention.
- Results/Conclusion.What are the expected outcomes and impact? Is the problem decreased or eliminated?What are the conclusions of this study in addressing this problem?What are the strengths and limitations of this study?Who will you share the findings with?How will these findings be disseminated?
- Contingency steps should the proposed intervention method for the identified problem fail.What would you change in your intervention strategy?Would you conduct more research?Would you try the intervention strategy again?Would you choose another intervention? Why?
Document Format and Length
Format your proposal using APA style.
- Use the APA Style Paper Template, linked in the assignment resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your plan. Be sure to include:A title page and references page.A 250–300-word abstract.Appropriate section headings.
- Your assignment should be 5–9 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
- Proposal RequirementsThe requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Applying Epidemiological Methods to an Intervention Study Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Design an appropriate intervention study to address an identified public health issue in a community of interest.Identify potential ethical issues in a proposed research project.Evaluate effectiveness of strategies used in previous intervention studies in addressing a public health issue.Integrate interdisciplinary collaboration in the design of the proposed intervention study.Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style
8/24/23, 12:13 PM
Applying Epidemiological Methods to an Intervention Study Scoring Guide
Applying Epidemiological Methods to an Intervention Study Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 7
Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.
CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED
Design an
appropriate
intervention study to
address an
identified public
health issue in a
community of
interest.
20%
Does not design an
intervention study to
address an
identified public
health issue in a
community of
interest.
Designs an intervention
study to address an
identified public health
issue in a community of
interest, but it is not
appropriate.
Designs an
appropriate
intervention study
to address an
identified public
health issue in a
community of
interest.
Designs an appropriate
intervention study to
address an identified
public health issue in a
community of interest,
and uses professionally
validated criteria to
evaluate the possible
benefits.
Identify potential
ethical issues in a
proposed research
project.
20%
Does not identify
potential ethical
issues in a
proposed research
project.
Identifies some but not
all potential ethical
issues in a proposed
research project.
Identifies potential
ethical issues in a
proposed research
project.
Identifies potential ethical
issues in a proposed
research project, and
suggests potential
remedies for identified
issues.
Evaluate
effectiveness of
strategies used in
previous
intervention studies
in addressing a
public health issue.
20%
Does not identify
effectiveness of
strategies used in
previous
intervention studies
in addressing a
public health issue.
Identifies but does not
evaluate effectiveness
of strategies used in
previous intervention
studies in addressing a
public health issue.
Evaluates
effectiveness of
strategies used in
previous
intervention studies
in addressing a
public health issue.
Evaluates effectiveness
of strategies used in
previous intervention
studies in addressing a
public health issue, and
identifies areas of
uncertainty or missing
information.
Integrate
interdisciplinary
collaboration in the
design of the
proposed
intervention study.
20%
Does not integrate
interdisciplinary
collaboration in the
design of the
proposed
intervention study.
Discusses the value of
integrating
interdisciplinary
collaboration, but does
not incorporate it into
the design of the
proposed intervention
study.
Integrates
interdisciplinary
collaboration in the
design of the
proposed
intervention study.
Integrates
interdisciplinary
collaboration in the
design of the proposed
intervention study, and
proposes criteria that
could be used to evaluate
the collaboration’s
effectiveness.
Write clearly and
concisely in a
logically coherent
and appropriate
form and style.
20%
Does not write
clearly and
concisely in a
logically coherent
and appropriate
form and style.
Writing lacks clarity or
conciseness, is loosely
structured, or includes
errors in grammar,
mechanics, or APA
formatting that inhibit
effective
communication or
detract from good
scholarship.
Writes clearly and
concisely in a
logically coherent
and appropriate
form and style.
Writes clearly and
concisely in a logically
coherent and appropriate
form and style. Main
points, ideas, arguments,
or propositions are welldeveloped and engaging.
Adheres to all applicable
disciplinary and scholarly
writing standards.
https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DRPH/DRPH8170/230700/Scoring_Guides/u07a1_scoring_guide.html
1/1