Chapter 5 of your textbook ICD-10-cm/pcs coding theory and practice, introduces the general coding guidelines section of the icd-10-cm official guidelines for coding and reporting. Using the discussion board rubric listed below as a guide, select two of the general coding guidelines and develop a well-thought-out original response explaining each of the guidelines in your own words. Be sure to be specific and provide examples, using a minimum of one reference to support your point of view.Two of the guidelines: 1. Acute and Chronic Conditions – Acute and chronic conditions – if the same condition is described as both acute (subacute) and chronic, and separate subentries exist in the alphabetic index at the same indentation level, code both and sequence the acute (subacute) code first.2. Syndromes – Follow the alphabetic index guidance when coding syndromes. In the absence of alphabetic index guidance, assign codes for the documented manifestations of the syndrome. additional codes for manifestation are not an integral part of the disease process maybe also be assigned when the condition does not have a unique code. Discussion Board Rubric
HINT221
Discussion Threads worth 10 possible points
Students are required to post one initial response, and two peer response for a total of 3 responses
Points
Possible
Initial Responses
Points
Possible
Peer Responses
5
Initial response posted by the end of the third day of the week.
-andWell-developed thoughts that fully address all aspects of the initial question(s)
with excellent integration of key concepts.
-andResponses are clear and concise with no grammatical or spelling errors.
5
At least two peer responses posted by the end of the week.
-andDemonstrated analysis of other classmates posts and included meaningful
comments that offered insight and expansion of thought
-andResponses are clear and concise with no grammatical/spelling errors.
4
Initial responses posted after the third day of the week.
-andWell-developed thoughts that address most all of the aspects of the initial
questions with good integration of key concepts.
-andResponses are clear and concise with few grammatical/spelling errors.
4
Only one peer response posted
-andElaborated on classmate’s responses with further comment or observation,
relevant to topic.
-andResponses are clear and concise with few grammatical/spelling errors.
3
Initial response posted by the third day of the week.
-andWell-developed thoughts that address some of the aspects of the initial
questions with good integration of key concepts.
-andResponses are relatively clear and contain many grammatical/spelling errors
3
Only one peer response posted
-andResponses were limited in relevance to classmates response and did not
enrich discussion (e.g. agrees or disagrees)
-andResponses are relatively clear and contain many grammatical/spelling errors.
1-2
Initial response posted after the third day of the week.
-andPoorly developed thoughts that address some of the aspects of the initial
questions with little integration of key concepts.
-andResponses lack clarity and contain many grammatical/spelling errors.
1-2
Only one peer response posted.
-andNo relevance or expansion of thought in response postings
-andResponses lack clarity and contain many grammatical/spelling errors.
0
No initial responses were posted.
0
No peer responses were posted.
Discussion Board Rubric
HINT221
Discussion Threads worth 10 possible points
Students are required to post one initial response, and two peer response for a total of 3 responses
Order an Essay Now & Get These Features For Free:
Turnitin Report
Formatting
Title Page
Citation
Outline
