WEEK 2 CASE STUDY: Review the cases 001, 004, 005, and 008 and compare this to the secondary data compiled in the spreadsheet report.
- The discrepancies are identified in the spreadsheet, summarize these discrepancies in the first part of your paper. if you identify any additional discrepancies, include these in this part as well (1 paragraph).
- In the second part of 3-5 paragraphs, explain the importance of reliability and accuracy of secondary data, and why this needs to be validated. Use a minimum of one reputable resource, this can be your textbook. In the final part of the, discuss how this assignment helped you to understand the importance of reliability and accuracy of secondary data.
Last
Name
Long
Smith
Myrna
Polanco
Pire
Atware
Jones
Pire
Seger
First
Name
Beth
John
Simon
Jay
Sally
Mellie
John
Molly
Sam
Admission Discharge
Date
Date
4/26/2016 4/30/2016
3/21/2016 3/22/2016
9/11/2016 9/12/2016
9/11/2016 9/12/2016
7/31/2016 8/5/2016
1/2/2016 1/12/2016
5/5/2016
5/7/2016
8/1/2016
8/3/2016
11/11/2016 11/22/2016
LOS
4
1
1
1
5
10
2
2
12
Gender
F
M
M
M
F
F
M
F
M
Admitting
Diagnosis
Present
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Discharge
Diagnosis
Present
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Admitting &
Discharge Diagnosis
Agree
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
Beth Long’s record matched the spreadsheet. Howev
Myrna Simon vs. Simon Myrna. It makes the correct g
Sally Pire – spreadsheet shows 7 day LOS. Spreadshee
Sam Seger – Facesheet shows accurate LOS of 11 days
tched the spreadsheet. However, there was no insurance listed for the patient
n Myrna. It makes the correct gender difficult to discern as well.
t shows 7 day LOS. Spreadsheet has correct LOS of 5 days
shows accurate LOS of 11 days, but spreadsheet shows 12